🐻 ⛓⛔ Berachain’s Launch — Missteps, Market Woes, and Hints of a Comeback

5 min readJust now

Berachain’s Mainnet debut was, by many accounts, underwhelming. Priced around $8 at launch and slipping to the $5 range shortly afterward, the project has faced unrelenting FUD, a market in freefall, and an undercooked ecosystem. Even so, it’s too early to call this an outright failure. Much of what Berachain promises — its high-yield DeFi ecosystem built on Proof of Liquidity — has yet to truly go live. Is there hope? Let’s explore what went wrong, the controversy around the airdrop, and why this chain might still offer strong yields for savvy users.

1. A Less-Than-Stellar Start

Fact: Berachain launched around $8 and has since slipped toward the mid-single-digit mark, landing near the top 150 in market capitalization. While alarming, only a few days have passed. The chain’s unique proposition — Proof of Liquidity — isn’t yet fully operational. Early hype pegged Berachain tokens at $40, but current conditions clearly paint a different picture.

Why Did Price Drop?

1. Market Crash for Altcoins

Many altcoins saw a 70% decline over the last month.
Launch timing was unfortunate, happening amidst a bloodbath.

2. Extreme FUD

Prominent influencers coordinated negative commentary on launch day.
Half-truths and misinformed claims undercut confidence.

3. Ecosystem Not Ready

A mere handful of live dApps the first day.
Proof of Liquidity (PoL) not fully in motion.
Hence, no immediate incentive to hold or utilize $BERA.

2. Errors from the Team

Multiple issues are fueling the negativity:

Launching Without Actual Utility:
Berachain’s entire brand revolves around its PoL system and a robust DeFi ecosystem. Yet, they launched with almost no DeFi apps or rewards in place. As a result, $BERA has felt “useless.”
Lack of Incentives for $BGT:
The chain’s engine relies on generating $BGT for liquidity providers, then staking or leveraging it within dApps. But at Day 1, the “flywheel” couldn’t spin at all.
Communication Gaps:
Some aspects — like inflation (10% annual) and VC staking — were revealed at the eleventh hour. Consequently, the community filled in the blanks with worst-case assumptions, creating more FUD.

If developers had explained the locked tokens, staking APR, and phased ecosystem rollouts earlier, many misunderstandings could have been avoided.

3. The FUD Factor

This is the most intense wave of FUD witnessed in a project’s early hours. Not just disgruntled airdrop participants — this wave included large Twitter and Instagram accounts attacking Berachain on launch day. Some criticisms had kernels of truth (like insufficient communication), while others were pure speculation (e.g., claims of a 20% APR for VC staked tokens). In reality, it’s closer to 3%.

Impact:

Distrust soared.
$BERA holders saw panic-selling.
The price had nowhere to go but down, especially in a bearish altcoin market.

4. Inflation, VCs, and a 3% APR Reality

One crucial misunderstanding revolved around the VC tokens. Yes, they have tokens locked for one year, followed by two years of linear vesting. However, locked tokens could still be staked, generating APR — a scenario leading many to believe VCs would aggressively dump large sums regularly.

Actual APR: Closer to 3% per year for stakers, not 20%.
Distribution of Inflation:
~16% goes to stakers.
~84% feeds PoL-based liquidity rewards.

With most tokens locked, big VC unlocks won’t happen until month 12, followed by 24 months of gradual vesting. By clarifying this earlier, Berachain could’ve silenced much of the FUD.

5. Controversial Airdrop Distribution

Bears Got the Lion’s Share

A 15% slice of $BERA’s total supply was earmarked for airdrops:

6.9% to holders of “B Bears,” the chain’s flagship NFT collection.
Remaining allocated among testers (testnet participants) and other grants (like Boyco).

This was widely known within Berachain’s NFT circles. Yet, many outside the loop perceived it as “insider favoritism.” In truth, the B Bears were listed publicly on OpenSea for three years, accessible to anyone.

Testnet: The Eternal Debate

Countless watchers expected a big testnet airdrop. However, testnets rarely deliver huge token giveaways because:

No Real Value: Over 100,000 testers might show up, but the devs only need a small subset for meaningful feedback.
Exorbitant Cost: Rewarding thousands of testers equally means minuscule amounts or unsustainable inflation.
Low or No ROI: Protocols gain limited benefit from purely “free” test usage.

Thus, some testnet participants who received zero or negligible $BERA felt shortchanged. From a dev standpoint, massive testnet airdrops are impractical.

6. The Future of Berachain: Three Phases

Phase 0: “Network Skeleton”

Mainnet live technically, but no real DeFi.
Minimal dApps, trivial PoL rewards.

Phase 1: Ecosystem Emergence

More protocols launch weekly.
PoL transitions into full throttle, distributing $BGT for liquidity.
Real yield strategies become possible, from farming to staking.

Phase 2: Decentralization & Maturity

Many more nodes come online.
Larger portion of supply in active play.
Stronger incentive structures and advanced DeFi features.

Until Phase 1 hits its stride, Berachain remains incomplete. The real test is whether these dApps roll out in time to capitalize on renewed market interest.

7. Should You Bet on $BERA Now?

Opinions are split:

Short-Term: The next few months could see hype cycles if dApps and PoL incentives drive usage. Some predict a short rally.
After 1 Year: VC unlocks loom, significantly increasing token supply. Many fear extra sell pressure.
DeFi Utility: Berachain’s yield environment might still be huge. Active farmers can earn robust APRs without heavy reliance on $BERA’s price. The network’s unique Proof of Liquidity, if executed correctly, can transform DeFi liquidity provisioning.

Conclusion

Berachain’s rocky start stands as a case study in how poor timing, deficient communication, and coordinated FUD can tank confidence in record time. But if you peel away the hype and negativity, two truths remain:

It’s Early — the majority of DeFi architecture is still offline.
Proof of Liquidity could prove valuable once the ecosystem is fully deployed.

Actionable Takeaways

Patience: If you’re intrigued, monitor upcoming dApp launches rather than panic-selling or buying blindly.
DeFi Farming: Berachain might still host top-tier yields once Phase 1 arrives.
Risk Tolerance: Approach $BERA with caution post Year 1 — significant VC unlocks may spark volatility.

What do you think?

Will PoL prove game-changing once these dApps materialize?
Or does Berachain risk sliding further with VC unlocks on the horizon?

Share your opinions below. Engaging in open dialogue could shape whether Berachain emerges as a top yield strategy or just another altcoin cautionary tale.